MANAGING RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES AMIDST A DYNAMIC EXTERNAL
ENVIRONMENT
As our operations are spread globally, our businesses are
exposed to a variety of risks. Our multi-layered risk management
system and robust governance framework help us align our
operating controls with the Group’s overarching vision and
mission. This, in turn, helps us deliver on our strategic
objectives.
Risk Governance Framework
Enterprise risk management
For our existing operations and ongoing projects, we identify
risks at the individual business-level by way of a consistently
applied methodology. We undertake business-level review meetings
at least once every quarter to discuss risk management formally.
Within the Group, every business division has created and
evolved its risk matrix and developed its risk registers. The
respective business divisions review the risks, changes in the
nature and extent of major risks since the last assessment and
control measures, and then decide on further action plans. These
risks are then reviewed by the Business Management Committee.
The business management teams also periodically review control
measures stated in the risk matrix in order to verify their
effectiveness. The CEOs of respective businesses chair these
meetings, which are also attended by CXOs, senior management and
the functional heads. At the business and Group level, the role
of Risk Officers is to create awareness among the senior
management on risks and to develop and nurture a risk-management
culture within the businesses. An integral part of KRAs and KPIs
of process owners is to come up with risk mitigation plans. The
governance of the risk management framework is anchored with the
leadership teams of individual businesses.
By identifying and assessing changes in risk exposure, reviewing
risk-control measures and approving remedial actions, wherever
appropriate, the Audit & Risk Management Committee aids the
Board in its risk management process. This Committee is
supported by the Group Risk Management Committee (GRMC), which
helps evaluate the design and operating effectiveness of the
risk mitigation programme and control systems. This analysis
discusses risks and mitigation measures, reviews the robustness
of our framework at an individual business level and maps
progress against actions planned for key risks by meeting at
least four times annually.
The GRMC, which meets every quarter, discusses key events
impacting the risk profile, relevant risks and uncertainties,
emerging risks and progress against planned actions. This
committee comprises the Group Chief Executive Officer, Group
Chief Financial Officer and Director-Management Assurance. The
Group Head - Health, Safety, Environment & Sustainability are
also invited to attend these meetings.
The risk management framework, which is simple and consistent,
provides clarity on managing and reporting risks to the Board.
Our management systems, organisational structures, processes,
standards and Code of Conduct and ethics together represent our
internal control systems. These internal control systems govern
how the Group conducts its business and manages associated
risks.
The Board shoulders the ultimate responsibility for the
management of risks and for ensuring the effectiveness of these
internal control systems. The Board’s responsibility includes a
review of the Audit & Risk Management Committee’s report on the
risk matrix, significant risks, and mitigating actions. A
regular review is conducted of any systemic weaknesses
identified and addressed by enhanced procedures to strengthen
the relevant controls.
Group Risk Management Framework
Risk management is embedded in business-critical activities,
functions and processes. This is also critical to deliver on the
Group’s strategic objectives. The Company’s risk management
framework is designed to manage, not eliminate, the risk of
failure to achieve its business objectives. The framework
provides reasonable, (not absolute), assurance against material
misstatement or loss. The key considerations of our
decision-making are materiality and risk tolerance.
Every manager and business leader is responsible for identifying
and managing risks. The key risk governance and oversight
committees in the Group are as below:
The Board is supported by the Committee of Directors (COD),
comprising the Vice Chairman and Group CFO, by considering,
reviewing and approving the borrowing and investment-related
proposals within the overall limits approved by the Board. The
CEO, Business CFOs, Group Head Treasury and BU Treasury Heads,
based on the agenda, are invited to these committee meetings
The Audit and Risk Management Committee, along with
Sustainability Committee, review sustainability-related risks
Various group-level ManCom such as Procurement ManCom,
Sustainability - HSE ManCom, and CSR ManCom work on
identifying specific risks and working out mitigation plans
Control Room at VZI
Every business has developed its risk matrix, which is reviewed
by the respective management committee/executive committee,
chaired by its CEO. In addition, depending on the size of its
operations and the number of SBUs/locations, every business has
developed its risk register. Across these risk registers, the
risks are aggregated and evaluated, the Group’s principal risks
are identified, and an adequate response mechanism is
formulated.
It is this element which is an important component of the
overall internal control process, from which the Board obtains
assurance. The scope of work, authority and resources of the
Management Assurance Services (MAS) are regularly reviewed by
the Audit Committee. Recommending improvements in the control
environment and reviewing compliance with our philosophy,
policies and procedures are the key responsibilities of MAS.
It is from the risk perspective that the planning of internal
audits is approached. Inputs are sought from the senior
management, business teams and members of the Audit Committee
and reference is made to the risk matrix while preparing the
internal audit plan. The past audit experience, financial
analysis and prevailing economic and business environment are
also referred to in the process.
In the section that follows, the order in which risks appear
does not necessarily reflect the likelihood of occurrence or the
relative magnitude of their impact on Vedanta’s businesses. For
each risk, the risk direction is reviewed based on the events,
economic conditions, changes in the business environment and
regulatory changes during the year.
The Company’s risk management framework has been formulated to
help the organisation meet its objectives. However, there is no
guarantee that the Group’s risk management activities will
mitigate these risks or prevent them, or other risks, from
occurring.
With the assistance of the management, the Board conducts
periodic and robust assessments of principal risks and
uncertainties of the Group, while also testing the financial
plans associated with each.
Impact: The resources sector is subject to
extensive health, safety and environmental laws,
regulations and standards. Evolving requirements and
stakeholder expectations could result in increased
costs or litigation or threaten the viability of
operations in extreme cases. Large-scale environmental
damage is amongst the top 10 risks, as per the World
Economic Forum’s Global Risk Report 2023 for the next
2 years, which can lead to global policy changes
Emissions and climate change
Climate change mitigation and adaption failure is
ranked amongst the top 10 risks as per World Economic
Forum’s Global Risk Report 2023 over the next 2 years
to 10 years. Our global presence exposes us to a
number of jurisdictions in which regulations or laws
have been, or are being, considered to limit or reduce
emissions. The likely effect of these changes could be
to increase the cost of fossil fuels, imposition of
levies for emissions in excess of certain permitted
levels and increase administrative costs for
monitoring and reporting. Increasing regulation of
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including the
progressive introduction of carbon emissions trading
mechanisms and tighter emission reduction targets, is
likely to raise costs and reduce demand growth
Mitigation
HSE is a high-priority area for Vedanta. Compliance
with international and local regulations and
standards, protecting our people, communities and
the environment from harm, and our operations from
business interruptions, are the key focus areas
Policies and standards are in place to mitigate and
minimise any HSE-related occurrences. Safety
standards are issued or continue to be issued to
reduce the risk level in high-risk areas. Structured
monitoring, a review mechanism and a system of
positive compliance reporting are in place
BU leadership continues to emphasise on three focus
areas: visible felt leadership, safety-critical
tasks and managing business partners
The process to improve learning from incidents is
currently being improved to reduce the re-occurrence
of similar incidents
A Vedanta Critical Risk Management programme will be
launched to identify critical risk controls and to
measure, monitor and report control effectiveness
The Company has implemented a set of standards to
align its sustainability framework with
international practices. A structured sustainability
assurance programme continues to operate in the
business divisions covering environment, health,
safety, community relations and human rights
aspects. This is designed to embed our commitment at
the operational level
All businesses have appropriate policies in place
for occupational health-related matters, supported
by structured processes, controls and technology
To provide incentives for safe behaviour and
effective risk management, safety KPIs have been
built into the performance management of all
employees
The carbon forum has been re-constituted with
updated terms of reference and representation from
all businesses. Its mandate is to develop and
recommend the carbon agenda for the Group to the
Executive Committee (ExCo) and Board
Enhanced focus on renewable power obligations
The Group companies are actively working on reducing
the intensity of GHG emissions in our operations
A task force team is formulated to assess end-to-end
operational requirements for the FGD plant. We
continue to engage with various stakeholders on the
matter
R2
Managing relationship with stakeholders
Impact: The continued success of our existing
operations and future projects is partly dependent on
the broad support and healthy relationships with our
local communities. Failure to identify and manage
local concerns and expectations can have a negative
impact on relations and, therefore, can affect the
organisation's reputation and social licence to
operate and grow
Mitigation
Our CSR approach to community programmes are
governed by the following key considerations
relating to the needs of the local people and the
development plan in line with the new Companies Act
in India; CSR Guidelines; CSR National Voluntary
Guidelines of the Ministry of Corporate Affairs,
Government of India; and the UN’s Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs)
Our BU teams are proactively engaging with
communities and stakeholders through a proper and
structured engagement plan, with the objective of
working with them as partners
A group-level CSR management committee meets every
fortnight to review and decide on strategic CSR
Planning, its execution and communication
Business Executive Committee (ExCo) factor in these
inputs, and then decide upon the focus areas of CSR
and budgets, in alignment with strategic business
priorities
All BUs follow well-laid processes for recording and
resolving all community and external grievances as
well as standard processes for social investment
Every business has a dedicated Community Development
Manager, who is a part of the BU ExCo. They are
supported by dedicated teams of community
professionals
Our business leadership teams have periodic
engagements with the local communities to build
relations based on trust and mutual benefit. Our
businesses seek to identify and minimise
anypotentially negative operational impact and risks
through responsible behaviour – that is, acting
transparently and ethically, promoting dialogue and
complying with commitments to stakeholders
Stakeholder engagement is driven basis the
stakeholder engagement plan at each BU by the CSR
and cross-functional teams. Regular social and
environmental risk assessment discussions happen at
the BU-level
Strategic CSR communication is being worked upon for
visibility. Efforts continue to meet with key
stakeholders, showcase our state-of-the-art
technology, increase organic followers and enhance
engagement through social media
CSR communication and engagement with all
stakeholders – within and outside communities
R3
Tailings dam stability
Impact: The release of waste material can lead
to loss of life, injuries, environmental damage,
reputational damage, financial costs and production
impacts. A tailings dam failure is considered to be a
catastrophic risk – i.e., a very high severity, but
very low-frequency event and is a continuous risk.
Hence, it receives the highest priority
Mitigation
The Risk Management Committee included a tailings
dam on the Group risk register with a requirement
for an annual internal review and a three-yearly
external review
Operation of the tailings dam is executed by
suitably experienced personnel within the businesses
Third party has been engaged to review tailings dam
operations, including the improvement opportunities
and remedial works required in addition to the
application of Operational Maintenance and
Surveillance (OMS) manuals in all operations. This
is an oversight role in addition to the technical
design and guidance arranged by respectiveBUs.
Technical guidelines are also being developed
Vedanta Tailings Management Standard has been
reviewed, augmented and reissued, including an
annual, independent review of every dam and a
half-yearly CEO sign-off that dams continue to be
managed within the design parameters and in
accordance with the last surveillance audit. Move
towards dry tailings facilities has commenced
Those responsible for dam management receive
training from third parties and will receive ongoing
support and coaching from international consultants
Management standards implemented with business
involvement
BUs are expected to ensure ongoing management of all
tailings facilities with ExCo oversight with
independent third-party assessment on the YoY
implementation status of Golder recommendations
Digitalisation of tailings monitoring facilities is
being carried out at the BUs
Tailing management standard is updated to include
latest best practices in tailing management. The
UNEP/ICMM Global Tailings Standard was incorporated
into Vedanta Standard during FY 2021
R4
Challenges in Aluminium and Power business
Impact: Our projects have been completed and
may be subject to a number of challenges during
operationalisation. These may also include challenges
around sourcing raw materials and
infrastructure-related aspects and concerns around ash
utilisation/evacuation
Mitigation
Despite the fluctuation in LME along with pressure
on cost, best-ever production outcomes have resulted
in a sustained performance in the Aluminium sector
Despite improvement in costs QoQ, along with
improved raw material security, alumina refinery
expansion from 2 MTPA to 5 MTPA is being pursued
Tapping of new coal mines and sourcing of bauxite
have been beneficial for plant operations
Continue to pursue new coal linkages to ensure coal
security
Inbound and outbound supply chains across rail, road
and ocean including manpower are functioning well,
with no major risks foreseen
Local sourcing of bauxite and alumina from Odisha
Jharsuguda facilities ramped up satisfactorily
Project teams in place for ash pond, red mud,
railway infrastructure and FGD
Dedicated teams working towards addressing the issue
of new emission norms for power plants
Global technical experts inducted to strengthen
operational excellence
Continuous focus on plant operating efficiency
improvement programme to achieve design parameters,
manpower rationalisation, logistics and cost
reduction initiatives
Continuous augmentation of power security and
infrastructure
Strong management team continues to work towards
sustainable low-cost production, operational
excellence and securing key raw material linkages
Talwandi Saboo (TSPL) power plant matters are being
addressed structurally by a competent team
R5
Discovery risk
Impact: Increased production rates from our
growth-oriented operations create demand for
exploration and prospecting initiatives so that
reserves and resources can be replaced at a pace
faster than depletion. Failure in our ability to
discover new reserves, enhance existing reserves or
develop new operations in sufficient quantities to
maintain or grow the current level of our reserves
could negatively affect our prospects. There are
numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating ore and
oil and gas reserves, and geological, technical, and
economic assumptions that are valid at the time of
estimation, may change significantly when new
information becomes available
Mitigation
Exploration Executive Committee has been established
to develop and implement strategy and review
projects group-wide
Dedicated exploration cell with a continuous focus
on enhancing exploration capabilities
Appropriate organisation and adequate financial
allocation in place for the exploration
Strategic priority is to add to our reserves and
resources by extending resources at a faster rate
than we deplete them, through continuous focus on
the drilling and exploration programme
Continue to make applications for new exploration
tenements in countries in which we operate under
their respective legislative regimes
Exploration-related systems are being strengthened
and standardised across the Group, and new
technologies are being utilised wherever appropriate
International technical experts and agencies are
working closely with our exploration teams to
enhance our capabilities
R6
Breaches in IT/cybersecurity
Impact: Like many global organisations, our
reliance on computers and network technology is
increasing. These systems could be subject to security
breaches resulting in theft, disclosure, or corruption
of key/strategic information. Security breaches could
also result in misappropriation of funds or
disruptions to our business operations. A
cybersecurity breach could impact business operations
Mitigation
Group-level focus on formulating necessary
frameworks, policies, and procedures in line with
best practices and international standards
Implementation and adoption of various best-in-class
tools and technologies for information security to
create a robust security posture
RCM (Risk Control Matrix) and IT General Controls
(ITGC) under SOx framework are performed as per
defined frequency and effectiveness
Structured and well-defined cyber security awareness
program to cover all classes of stakeholders,
including employees and the leadership
Special focus to strengthen the security landscape
of plant technical systems (PTS) through various
initiatives
Adoption of various international standards related
to information security, disaster recovery and
business continuity management, IT risk management
and setting up of internal IT processes and
practices in line with these standards
Work towards ensuring strict adherence to IT-related
SOPs to improve operating effectiveness, continuous
focus on mandatory employee training on
cybersecurity awareness
Periodic assessment of entire IT system landscapes
and governance framework from vulnerability and
penetration perspective, undertaken by reputed
expert agencies and addressing the identified
observations in a time-bound manner
Structured and well-defined cyber security awareness
programme in place to cover all classes of
stakeholders from employees to leadership and will
include Board members too
R7
Loss of assets or profit due to natural calamities
Impact: Our operations may be subject to a
number of circumstances not wholly within the Group's
control. These include damage to or breakdown of
equipment or infrastructure, unexpected geological
variations or technical issues, extreme weather
conditions and natural disasters – any of which could
adversely affect production and/or costs.
Mitigation
Vedanta has taken an appropriate Group insurance
cover to mitigate this risk and an Insurance Council
is in place to monitor the adequacy of coverage and
status of claims
An external agency reviews the risk portfolio and
adequacy of this cover and assists us in reviewing
our insurance portfolio
We engage underwriters from reputed institutions to
underwrite our risk
Established mechanisms of periodic insurance review
in place at all entities. However, any occurrence
not fully covered by insurance could have an adverse
effect on the Group's business
Continuous monitoring and periodic review of
security and insurance function
Continue to focus on capability building within the
Group
R8
Cairn-related challenges
Impact: Cairn India has 70% participating
interest in Rajasthan Block, the production sharing
contract (PSC) of which was valid till 2020. The
Government of India has granted its approval for a
10-year extension at less favourable terms, pursuant
to its policy for extension of Pre-New Exploration and
Licensing Policy (NELP) Exploration Blocks, subject to
certain conditions. Ramp-up of production compared
with what was envisaged may impact profitability
Mitigation
Rajasthan PSC extension for 10 years from 15 May
2020 to 14 May 2030 has been executed by the parties
to the PSC on 27 October 2022
The applicability of the Pre-NELP Extension Policy
to the RJ Block is currently sub judice
Focussed efforts on managing production decline
through:
– Infill wells across producing fields
– Enhanced recovery projects in key producing
fields
– Exploration drilling across the portfolio to add
resources
Project Management Committee and Project Operating
Committee were set up to provide support to the
outsourcing partner and address issues on time to
enable better quality control and timely execution
of growth projects
R9
Regulatory and legal risk
Impact: We have operations in many countries
around the globe. These may be impacted because of
legal and regulatory changes in the countries in which
we operate, resulting in higher operating costs,
and/or restrictions such as the imposition or increase
in royalties or taxation rates, export duty, impact on
mining rights/bans, and changes in legislation.
Mitigation
The Group and its business divisions monitor
regulatory developments on an ongoing basis
Business-level teams identify and meet regulatory
obligations and respond to emerging requirements
Focus on communicating our responsible mining
credentials through representations to government
and industry associations
Continue to demonstrate the Group's commitment to
sustainability through proactive environmental,
safety and CSR practices. Ongoing engagement with
local community/media/NGOs
SOx-compliant subsidiaries
Common compliance monitoring system being
implemented in Group companies. Legal requirements
and a responsible person for compliance have been
mapped in the system
Legal counsels within the Group continue to work on
strengthening the compliance and governance
framework and the resolution of legal disputes
A competent in-house legal organisation is in place
at all the businesses; these legal teams have been
strengthened with the induction of senior legal
professionals across all Group companies
SOPs implemented across our businesses for
compliance monitoring
Greater focus on timely closure of key
non-compliances
Contract management framework was strengthened with
the issue of boilerplate clauses across the Group,
which will form a part of all contracts. All key
contract types have also been standardised
Framework for monitoring performance against
anti-bribery and corruption guidelines is in place
R10
Tax related matters
Impact: Our businesses are in a tax regime and
changes in any tax structure, or any tax-related
litigation may impact our profitability.
Mitigation
Tax Council reviews all key tax litigations and
provides advice to the Group
Continue to engage with authorities concerned on tax
matters
Robust organisation in place at the business and
Group-level to handle tax-related matters
Continue to consult and obtain opinions from
reputable tax consulting firms on major tax matters
to mitigate tax riskson the Group and its
subsidiaries
Impact: Prices and demand for the Group's
products may remain volatile/uncertain and could be
influenced by global economic conditions, natural
disasters, weather, pandemics, such as the COVID-19
outbreak, political instability, and so on. Volatility
in commodity prices and demand may adversely affect
our earnings, cash flow and reserves.
Our assets, earnings and cash flow are influenced by a
variety of currencies due to our multi-geographic
operations. Fluctuations in exchange rates of those
currencies may have an impact on our financials
Mitigation
The Group’s well-diversified portfolio acts as a
hedge against fluctuations in commodities and
delivers cashflow through the cycle
Pursue low-cost production, allowing profitable
supply throughout the commodity price cycle
Vedanta considers exposure to commodity price
fluctuations to be integral to the Group's business
and its usual policy is to sell its products at
prevailing market prices. Its policy is not to enter
into price hedging arrangements other than for
businesses of custom smelting and purchased alumina,
where back-to-back hedging is used to mitigate
pricing risks. Strategic hedge, if any, is taken
after appropriate deliberations and due approval
from ExCo
Our forex policy prohibits forex speculation
Robust controls in forex management to hedge
currency risk liabilities on a back-to-back basis
Finance Standing Committee reviews all forex and
commodity-related risks and suggests necessary
course of action to business divisions
Seek to mitigate the impact of short-term currency
movements on businesses by hedging short-term
exposures progressively, based on their maturity.
However, large, or prolonged movements in exchange
rates may have a material adverse effect on the
Group's businesses, operating results, financial
condition and/or prospects
Notes to the financial statements in the Annual
Report provide details of the accounting policy
followed in calculating the impact of currency
translation
Any sharp movements in commodity prices are
discussed at the Group commercial and marketing
Mancoms and suitable actions are discussed,
deliberated and implemented
R12
Major project delivery
Impact: Shortfall in the achievement of stated
objectives of expansion projects, leading to
challenges in achieving stated business milestones –
existing and new growth projects.
Mitigation
Project management organisation cell set up at a
Group level with the objective of monitoring growth
project progress, extracting useful insights through
market research, leveraging data analytics and
benchmarking with best-in-class projects
Empowered organisation structure in place to drive
growth projects; project management systems
streamlined to ensure full accountability and value
stream mapping
Strong focus on safety aspects in the project
Geo-technical audits conducted by independent
agencies
Engaged global engineering partner to do complete
life of mine planning and capital efficiency
analysis to ensure that the project objectives are
in sync with the business plan and growth targets
Standard specifications and SOPs were developed for
all operations to avoid variability; reputed
contractors engaged to ensure the completion of the
project on indicated timelines
Use of best-in-class technology and equipment to
develop mines, ensuring the highest level of
productivity and safety. Digitisation and analytics
help improve productivity and recovery
Stage gate process to review risks and remedy at
multiple stages on the way
Robust quality control procedures implemented to
check the safety and quality of
services/design/actual physical work
Use of a reputed international agency for Geotech
modelling and technical support, wherever required
R13
Access to capital
Impact: The Group may be unable to meet its
payment obligations when due or may be unable to
borrow funds in the market at an acceptable price to
fund actual or proposed commitments. A sustained
adverse economic downturn and/or suspension of its
operations in any business, affecting revenue and free
cash flow generation, may cause stress on the
Company's ability to raise financing at competitive
terms.
Mitigation
Focussed team continues to work on proactive
refinancing initiatives with an objective to contain
cost and extend tenure
Team is actively building the pipeline for long-term
funds for near-to-medium term requirements, both for
refinancing and growth capex
Track record of good relations with banks, and of
raising borrowings in the last few years
Regular discussions with rating agencies to build
confidence in operating performance
Business teams ensure continued compliance with the
Group’s treasury policies that govern our financial
risk management practices
CRISIL and India ratings maintained ratings at “AA”
with the outlook revised to negative from stable