BUSINESS

Risks

We proactively work to minimise our risks by accepting and eliminating them while identifying and taking advantage of opportunities. Our strategic priorities and strong opportunity management culture give us a competitive edge in spotting opportunities and making the best of them.

Enterprise Risk Management

As a global natural resources company, our businesses are exposed to a variety of risks. It is therefore essential to have in place the necessary systems and a robust governance framework to manage risk, while balancing the risk-reward equation expected by stakeholders.

Risk Governance Framework

Our risk management framework is designed to be simple and consistent and provide clarity on managing and reporting risks to our Board. Together, our management systems, organisational structures, processes, standards and code of conduct and ethics form the system of internal control that governs how the Group conducts its business and manages the associated risks.

The Board has the ultimate responsibility for the management of risks and for ensuring the effectiveness of internal control systems. The Board’s review includes the Audit Committee’s report on the risk matrix, significant risks, and the mitigating actions we have put in place. Any weaknesses identified by the review are addressed by enhanced procedures to strengthen the relevant controls, and these are reviewed at regular intervals.

The Audit Committee is in turn assisted by the Group-level Risk Management Committee in evaluating the design and effectiveness of the risk mitigation programme and control systems.

The Group Risk Management Committee (GRMC) meets every quarter and comprises the Group Chief Executive Officer, Group Chief Financial Officer, Non-Executive Director and Director-Management Assurance. The Group Head-Health, Safety, Environment & Sustainability is invited to attend these meetings. GRMC discusses key events impacting the risk profile, key risks and uncertainties, emerging risks and progress against planned actions.

In addition to the above structure, other key risk governance and oversight committees in the Group include the following:

  • Finance Standing Committee (FSC) comprises Group CEO, Group CFO and Non-Executive Director and it supports the Board by considering and approving matters related to finance, investment, banking, treasury, etc. Invitees to these committee meetings are the business CFOs, Group Head Treasury and BU Treasury Heads. In addition to this, the Investment Committee reviews the investment related risks
  • Sustainability Committee reviews sustainability related risks
  • Group Project/Capex Council evaluates risks while reviewing any capital investment decisions as well as works on instituting risk management framework in projects

In addition to the above, there are various group-level councils such as Procurement Council, Tax Council, HSE Council, Insurance Council, CSR Committee, etc. that work on identifying risks in those specific areas and mitigating them. The Group has a consistently applied methodology for identifying risks at the individual business level for existing operations and for ongoing projects.

Read More

At a business level, formal discussions on risk management occur at review meetings at least once a quarter. The respective businesses review their major risks, and changes in their nature and extent since the last assessment and discuss the control measures which are in place and further action plans. The control measures stated in the risk matrix are also periodically reviewed by the business management teams to verify their continued effectiveness. These meetings are chaired by the respective business CEOs and attended by CXOs, senior management and appropriate functional heads.

Risk officers have been formally nominated at each of the operating businesses as well as at Group level, whose role is to create awareness of risks at senior management level and to develop and nurture a risk management culture. Risk mitigation plans form an integral part of the performance management process. Structured discussions on risk management also happen at business level with regard to their respective risk matrix and mitigation plans. The leadership teams of the businesses are accountable for governance of the risk management framework and they provide regular updates to the GRMC.

Each of our businesses have developed their own respective risk matrix, which is reviewed by their respective management committee/ executive committee, chaired by their CEOs. In addition, each business has developed its own risk register depending on the size of its operations and number of Strategic Business Units locations. Risks across these risk registers are aggregated and evaluated and the Group’s principal risks are identified based on the frequency, and potential magnitude and impact of the risks identified.

This element is an important component of the overall internal control process, from which the Board obtains assurance. The scope of work, authority and resources of Management Assurance Services (MAS) are regularly reviewed by the Audit Committee. The responsibilities of MAS include recommending improvements in the control environment and reviewing compliance with our philosophy, policies and procedures.

The planning of internal audits is approached from a risk perspective. In preparing the internal audit plan, reference is made to the risk matrix, and inputs are sought from senior management, business teams and members of the Audit Committee. In addition, we make reference to past audit experience, financial analysis and the current economic and business environment.

The year 2020 has seen the outbreak of COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. As a result of COVID-19, we have seen macro-economic uncertainty with regards to prices and demand for commodities and oil & gas. Furthermore, recent global developments and uncertainty in oil supply in March have caused further volatility in commodity markets. The scale and duration of these developments remain uncertain but could impact earnings and cash flow of resource companies.

The order in which these risks appear in the section below does not necessarily reflect the likelihood of their occurrence or the relative magnitude of their impact on our business. The risk direction of each risk has been reviewed based on events, economic conditions, changes in business environment and regulatory changes during the year. While Vedanta’s risk management framework is designed to help the organisation meet its objectives, there can be no guarantee that the Group’s risk management activities will mitigate or prevent these or other risks from occurring.

Read Less

The Board, with the assistance of management, carries out periodic and robust assessments of the principal risks and uncertainties of the Group and tests the financial plans for each of risks and uncertainties mentioned below.

Sustainability Risks
Icon Carrot
RISK DIRECTION
IMPACT
Health, safety and environment (HSE)

The resources sector is subject to extensive health, safety and environmental laws, regulations and standards. Evolving requirements and stakeholder expectations could result in increased cost or litigation or threaten the viability of operations in extreme cases.

Emissions and climate change

Our global presence exposes us to a number of jurisdictions in which regulations or laws have been, or are being, considered to limit or reduce emissions. The likely effect of these changes could be to increase the cost for fossil fuels, impose levies for emissions in excess of certain permitted levels, and increase administrative costs for monitoring and reporting. Increasing regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including the progressive introduction of carbon emissions trading mechanisms and tighter emission reduction targets, is likely to raise costs and reduce demand growth.

MITIGATION
  • HSE is a high priority area for Vedanta. Compliance with international and local regulations and standards, protecting our people, communities and the environment from harm and our operations from business interruptions are key focus areas
  • Policies and standards are in place to mitigate and minimise any HSE- related occurrences. Safety standards issued/continue to be issued to reduce risk level in high risk areas. Structured monitoring and a review mechanism and system of positive compliance reporting are in place
  • Read More
  • BU Leadership continues to emphasise on three focus areas i.e. Visible Felt Leadership, safety critical tasks and managing business partners
  • The process to improve learning from incidents is currently being improved with the aim of reducing re-occurrence of similar incidents
  • A Vedanta Critical Risk Management programme will be launched to identify critical risk controls and to measure, monitor and report the control effectiveness
  • The Company has implemented a set of standards to align its sustainability framework with international practice. A structured sustainability assurance programme continues to operate in the business divisions covering environment, health, safety, community relations and human rights aspects, and is designed to embed our commitment at operational level
  • All businesses have appropriate policies in place for occupational health-related matters, supported by structured processes, controls and technology
  • To provide incentives for safe behaviour and effective risk management, safety KPIs have been built into performance management of all employees
  • Carbon forum has been re-constituted with updated Terms of Reference and representation from all businesses. It has a mandate to develop and recommend to the ExCo and Board the carbon agenda for the Group
  • The Group Companies are actively working on reducing the GHG Emissions Intensity of our operations
  • A task force team is formulated to assess end-to-end operational requirement for FGD plant. We continue to engage with various stakeholders on the matter
  • Read Less
IMPACT
Managing relationship with stakeholders

The continued success of our existing operations and future projects are in part dependent on broad support and a healthy relationship with our respective local communities. Failure to identify and manage local concerns and expectations can have a negative impact on relations and therefore affect the organisation’s reputation and social licence to operate and grow.

MITIGATION
  • CSR approach to community programmes is governed by the following key considerations: the needs of the local people and the development plan in line with the new Companies Act in India; CSR guidelines; CSR National Voluntary Guidelines of theMinistry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India; and the UN’s sustainable development goals
  • Our BU teams are proactively engaging with communities and stakeholders through a proper and structured engagement plan, with the objective of working with them as partners
  • Read More
  • Business ExCos factor in these inputs, and then decide upon focus areas of CSR and budgets while also aligning with strategic business priorities
  • All BUs follow well-laid processes for recording and resolving all community grievances
  • Every business has a dedicated Community Development Manager, who is a part of the BU ExCos. They are supported with dedicated teams of community professionals
  • Our business leadership teams have periodic engagements with the local communities to build relations based on trust and mutual benefit. Our businesses seek to identify and minimise any potentially negative operational impacts and risks through responsible behaviour - acting transparently and ethically, promoting dialogue and complying with commitments to stakeholders
  • Stakeholder engagement is driven basis stakeholder engagement plan at each BUs by CSR and cross functional teams. Regular social and environment risk assessment discussions are happening at BU level
  • Strategic CSR communication is being worked upon for visibility. Efforts continue to meet with key stakeholders, showcase our state-of-the-art technology, increase the organic followers and enhance engagement through social media
  • CSR communication and engagement with all stakeholders – within and outside communities
  • Read Less
IMPACT
Tailings dam stability

A release of waste material leading to loss of life, injuries, environmental damage, reputational damage, financial costs and production impacts. A tailings dam failure is considered to be a catastrophic risk – i.e. a very high severity but very low frequency event that must be given the highest priority.

MITIGATION
  • The Risk Management Committee included tailings dams on the Group Risk Register with a requirement for annual internal review and threeyearly external review
  • Operation of tailings dams is executed by suitably experienced personnel within the businesses
  • Read More
  • Third party has been engaged to review tailings dam operations, including improvement opportunities/remedial works required and the application of Operational Maintenance and Surveillance (OMS) manuals in all operations. This is an oversight role in addition to technical design and guidance arranged by respective business units. Technical guidelines are also being developed
  • Vedanta Tailings Management Standard has been reviewed, augmented and reissued including an annual, independent review of every dam and half-yearly CEO sign-off that dams continue to be managed within design parameters and in accordance with the last surveillance audit. Move towards dry tailings facilities has commenced
  • Those responsible for dam management received training from third party and will receive ongoing support and coaching from international consultants
  • Management standard implemented with business involvement
  • BU’s are expected to ensure ongoing management of all tailings facilities with ExCo oversight with independent third-partyassessment on Golder recommendations implementation status y-o-y
  • Tailing management standard is updated to include latest best practices in tailing management. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/International Council on Mining & Metals (ICMM) Global Tailings Standard to be incorporated into Vedanta Standard during FY2021
  • Read Less
RISK DIRECTION
IMPACT
Health, safety and environment (HSE)

The resources sector is subject to extensive health, safety and environmental laws, regulations and standards. Evolving requirements and stakeholder expectations could result in increased cost or litigation or threaten the viability of operations in extreme cases.

Emissions and climate change

Our global presence exposes us to a number of jurisdictions in which regulations or laws have been, or are being, considered to limit or reduce emissions. The likely effect of these changes could be to increase the cost for fossil fuels, impose levies for emissions in excess of certain permitted levels, and increase administrative costs for monitoring and reporting. Increasing regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including the progressive introduction of carbon emissions trading mechanisms and tighter emission reduction targets, is likely to raise costs and reduce demand growth.

MITIGATION
  • HSE is a high priority area for Vedanta. Compliance with international and local regulations and standards, protecting our people, communities and the environment from harm and our operations from business interruptions are key focus areas
  • Policies and standards are in place to mitigate and minimise any HSE- related occurrences. Safety standards issued/continue to be issued to reduce risk level in high risk areas. Structured monitoring and a review mechanism and system of positive compliance reporting are in place
  • Read More
  • BU Leadership continues to emphasise on three focus areas i.e. Visible Felt Leadership, safety critical tasks and managing business partners
  • The process to improve learning from incidents is currently being improved with the aim of reducing re-occurrence of similar incidents
  • A Vedanta Critical Risk Management programme will be launched to identify critical risk controls and to measure, monitor and report the control effectiveness
  • The Company has implemented a set of standards to align its sustainability framework with international practice. A structured sustainability assurance programme continues to operate in the business divisions covering environment, health, safety, community relations and human rights aspects, and is designed to embed our commitment at operational level
  • All businesses have appropriate policies in place for occupational health-related matters, supported by structured processes, controls and technology
  • To provide incentives for safe behaviour and effective risk management, safety KPIs have been built into performance management of all employees
  • Carbon forum has been re-constituted with updated Terms of Reference and representation from all businesses. It has a mandate to develop and recommend to the ExCo and Board the carbon agenda for the Group
  • The Group Companies are actively working on reducing the GHG Emissions Intensity of our operations
  • A task force team is formulated to assess end-to-end operational requirement for FGD plant. We continue to engage with various stakeholders on the matter
  • Read Less
IMPACT
Managing relationship with stakeholders

The continued success of our existing operations and future projects are in part dependent on broad support and a healthy relationship with our respective local communities. Failure to identify and manage local concerns and expectations can have a negative impact on relations and therefore affect the organisation’s reputation and social licence to operate and grow.

MITIGATION
  • CSR approach to community programmes is governed by the following key considerations: the needs of the local people and the development plan in line with the new Companies Act in India; CSR guidelines; CSR National Voluntary Guidelines of theMinistry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India; and the UN’s sustainable development goals
  • Our BU teams are proactively engaging with communities and stakeholders through a proper and structured engagement plan, with the objective of working with them as partners
  • Read More
  • Business ExCos factor in these inputs, and then decide upon focus areas of CSR and budgets while also aligning with strategic business priorities
  • All BUs follow well-laid processes for recording and resolving all community grievances
  • Every business has a dedicated Community Development Manager, who is a part of the BU ExCos. They are supported with dedicated teams of community professionals
  • Our business leadership teams have periodic engagements with the local communities to build relations based on trust and mutual benefit. Our businesses seek to identify and minimise any potentially negative operational impacts and risks through responsible behaviour - acting transparently and ethically, promoting dialogue and complying with commitments to stakeholders
  • Stakeholder engagement is driven basis stakeholder engagement plan at each BUs by CSR and cross functional teams. Regular social and environment risk assessment discussions are happening at BU level
  • Strategic CSR communication is being worked upon for visibility. Efforts continue to meet with key stakeholders, showcase our state-of-the-art technology, increase the organic followers and enhance engagement through social media
  • CSR communication and engagement with all stakeholders – within and outside communities
  • Read Less
IMPACT
Tailings dam stability

A release of waste material leading to loss of life, injuries, environmental damage, reputational damage, financial costs and production impacts. A tailings dam failure is considered to be a catastrophic risk – i.e. a very high severity but very low frequency event that must be given the highest priority.

MITIGATION
  • The Risk Management Committee included tailings dams on the Group Risk Register with a requirement for annual internal review and threeyearly external review
  • Operation of tailings dams is executed by suitably experienced personnel within the businesses
  • Read More
  • Third party has been engaged to review tailings dam operations, including improvement opportunities/remedial works required and the application of Operational Maintenance and Surveillance (OMS) manuals in all operations. This is an oversight role in addition to technical design and guidance arranged by respective business units. Technical guidelines are also being developed
  • Vedanta Tailings Management Standard has been reviewed, augmented and reissued including an annual, independent review of every dam and half-yearly CEO sign-off that dams continue to be managed within design parameters and in accordance with the last surveillance audit. Move towards dry tailings facilities has commenced
  • Those responsible for dam management received training from third party and will receive ongoing support and coaching from international consultants
  • Management standard implemented with business involvement
  • BU’s are expected to ensure ongoing management of all tailings facilities with ExCo oversight with independent third-partyassessment on Golder recommendations implementation status y-o-y
  • Tailing management standard is updated to include latest best practices in tailing management. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)/International Council on Mining & Metals (ICMM) Global Tailings Standard to be incorporated into Vedanta Standard during FY2021
  • Read Less